NHS

Talent or System?

Two takes on the 49ers' demise


Horizontal Break

September 22, 1999 (NHS) -- A lot of people are writing the NHS sounding the death knell of the 49ers with their own reasons why the 49ers have looked so poor. We asked two NHS editors to chime in with their take on why the 49ers are going down hard this year. One thinks the complete lack of talent is the downfall, while the other cites the promulgation of the West Coast Offense around the league. Feel free to send us your reasons as well or vote in our poll at the NHS message board.

DESPITE CHEESE FACTOR, FLIMSY NINERS COMING TO AN END

We've all seen it many times over the years: the Niners get into a tough game against a mediocre opponent and, through some fortuitous combination of erroneous officiating, lucky breaks and bounces, their opponent's stupidity, or all of the above, San Francisco manages to cheese out a last-minute victory. Throw last weekend's Saints game on the pile with the rest. Three penalties, a replay reversal, and a bad Billy Joe Hobert pass down the stretch sealed the win for the Niners after New Orleans had spent much of the first 56 minutes of the game whooping ass on the merlot and cheddar. All in all, it was a by-the-book win.

So are we in for another season of the Niner cheese leading them to the Promised Land of a division title and a home-field playoff game? Hardly. This year, folks, is going to be different. This year, the Saints game notwithstanding, those breaks won't all go in the direction of the "Bay Area."

What is different? you might be asking. What has changed from, say, last year, when the 49ers cheesed out two wins over Carolina, or 1997, when for five consecutive weeks, the Niners caught a break from the officials that significantly impacted the outcome of the game? Simply this: in those years, the 49ers had a significant amount of talent, talent to keep them in almost every game, at which point the cheese factor would swing the close ones in their direction most of the time.

This year, most of that talent is gone. An off-season of salary-cap purging and stocking the new Browns with personnel has left the team decimated at most positions. San Francisco is subpar at several positions, and that's at starter -- the backups are even worse. Their cornerbacks are tiny and can't really cover, their pass rush is inadequate, their offensive line is a collander, and the running game is an afterthought.

Therein lies the biggest difference between previous years and the current campaign. The Saints game was a glaring sign of what the Niners will have to face almost every week -- a constant battle and a scoreboard that shows, more often than not, that the other team is ahead. In the past, the Niners would intersperse blowout wins with those of the cheesy variety. Most likely, that won't be the case this season. Every week will be a test for this mediocre team and though the breaks will likely go their way often, as usual, they simply won't be able to cheese out a win like Sunday's with any regularity -- or at least enough to maintain a record that gives the impression that they are an elite team.

And those are just the close ones. If New Orleans, as weak as it is on offense, walked in to 3Com and moved the ball with relative ease, just think of what the Packers and Redskins and Vikings are going to do. While the Niners are usually good for maybe one blowout loss per year, they've already been killed this year, and there are still 14 games left to go. One or more cakewalk wins -- in addition to the Jaguars game -- for Niner opponents is certainly not out of the question, given the remaining schedule.

Therefore, given the fact that they probably stand to lose at least one more game by a wide margin, and that most of the rest of the games will be tight contests which will go either way, Niner haters don't have much to worry about. Gone are the days when the Niners would romp over half their opponents and cheese over most of the other half.

Are we saying that they won't win at least 10 games and make the playoffs? No, we could never be that bold. The Niner cheese factor is probably too pervasive, even given their weak talent. What we ARE saying is this: don't expect 12 wins, don't expect anything other than a wild card, and don't expect to see the team anywhere near the NFC Championship Game (and probably not even a divisional playoff, at that). Even the cheese factor can't overcome the serious deficiencies on this squad.

However, should a few opponents step up, and should the breaks actually even out for once in a blue moon, Niner haters may get what they've been waiting oh-so-patiently for: an 8-8 record or worse, no playoff appearance, and a final and total end to the years of "Best Ever" blather about this overrated band of lucky stiffs.

PROLIFERATION OF WEST COAST OFFENSE MEANS GIMMICK IS GONE

The 49ers look old, slow and downright terrible. Jacksonville took them apart and the Saints manhandled them until divine intervention from the zebras saved their asses. It is virtually impossible to believe that officiating will keep them in every game this year (although with the 49ers, you never know), so all signs point to a dismal year for the cranberry-and-butterscotch.

However, if the 49ers finally struggle this year it won't be because of a lack of talent. It will be because of the spread of the West Coast Offense (WCO).

Certainly there is a dearth of talent on the 49ers, but talent has never been the major reason the 49ers have won. All along it has been the combination of the WCO, easy division/schedule and generous officiating mostly accounting for their run of success, while talent has been a very small factor. This is why so many people become 49er-Haters: they can't stand a pretender, a team that wins without earning it.

Here's how factors other than talent have affected the 49ers in the past:

NFC WEST/SCHEDULE: The 49ers have always had the advantage of an easy schedule. Obviously the NFC West has been a joke the last six years, but we're talking even before that during the rare years when the NFC West was decent. Since 1981 the 49ers have averaged playing 10 teams with losing records per year. Remember, the old schedule was formulated for the 49ers to play 4 games out of 16 (25%) against last place teams: two games against the last place team in the NFC West, and to make up for the division only having four teams, one game against the last place teams from the NFC Central and NFC East.

OFFICIATING: Every football fan worth his grain of salt is fully aware that the 49ers have received the most breaks perhaps in NFL history. Conversely, you can count the unfair calls going against the 49ers in the last twenty years on one hand (but heaven forbid when it happens because it's the end of the world - we still laughingly get emails from 49er fans frothing over Don Beebe). We've proven the referee bias at this web site: quick glance at our past game reviews reveals a healthy 33% or more of 49er games involving some indisputable bogus incident in their favor.

WEST COAST OFFENSE: Imagine you were a defensive coordinator in the NFC in the '80's and early '90's. You had to build a defense to try to stop Eric Dickerson, Walter Payton, Barry Sanders, Emmitt Smith and Bill Parcels-type ball control offenses. You had to load the box with eight guys and play a three-deep zone to prevent any big plays. Then, after weeks of smash-mouth football, the 49ers would appear next on your schedule doing something completely different - the WCO and its dink passes underneath. Sure, you could throw in nickels and dimes, but the bottom line is that the standard 4-3 defense with its zone variations is no match for the WCO because those pass defenses are designed to give up the very thing the WCO wants to take: the short pass. These old defensive schemes give a free pass to the WCO's base plays, such as the dump-off to the tailback. Therefore, even if that defense had players with superior talent - as was often the case -- the odds were it would fail and the 49ers would win because the battle was already lost on paper.

But what was a coordinator to do? Shift his entire defensive philosophy and scheme to battle the WCO once a year when the 49ers came to town? No, they had to continue to prepare for the majority - the smash-mouth game - and let the 49ers get away with doing their little cheesy long-handoff thing. So team after team, year after year would play the same old soft zone and lose, despite the obvious successes of guys like Fritz Shurmur who would change things up and neutralize the WCO.

The result is that while the talent level has varied over the years, whether Joe Montana, Jeff Kemp or Steve Bono was quarterbacking, the 49ers continued to win just about the same amount every year, give or take a win or two because the gimmick of the WCO masked their true lack of talent. Again, this is exactly why so many people are 49er-haters: the WCO and other factors allowed players to succeed more than their talent should have let them. If you took the 1988 Buccaneers, traded uniforms, let the Bucs run the WCO and gave them the easy schedule and favorable calls, you better damn well believe they would have made the playoffs if not the Super Bowl.

So what does all this mean for this year? Yes, the 49ers looked like crap the first two weeks, but it is wrong to attribute their demise to eroding talent. The key reason the 49ers have struggled is because both opponents engaged defensive schemes designed to stop the WCO. Instead of sitting back softly, the Jags and Saints challenged every short pass and made the 49ers offense look anemic.

1999 may be the year the tables have finally turned on the 49ers. Their offense is no longer the exception that defensive coordinators try to stop by slapping together some amendments onto their overmatched schemes in the few days the week before gametime. The WCO is now the prevailing offensive scheme in football. Most defenses are now built on speed, geared to stop the short passing game first and the opponent's rushing attack just secondarily.

In short, as the team vanishes faster than a 49er fan in the fourth quarter, don't overplay the talent factor. Yes, the 49ers are obviously one of the least talented teams in the NFL, but the talent factor for the 49ers has always been overrated. The WCO always provided an uneven playing field hiding the 49ers' true talent level. What we're actually seeing now is the field being leveled, the evolution of NFL defenses finally catching up with the WCO in direct response to its proliferation throughout the league. The ugly truth about their talent is finally being revealed.

What is truly satisfying is the realization that the 49ers themselves will be their ultimate executioner. Bill Walsh's ego has pushed many 49er assistants into coaching positions and the 49ers have patted themselves on their backs praising their "best ever" system of ugly football that has watered down the game. They used to be exception to the rule. Now that they are no longer the exception, they are going to find a new rule.

Horizontal Break

Return to Table of Contents

We welcome all comments.

Want to become a member? Go to membership.

http://www.49erhaters.com/twotake.html
created: September 22, 1999
copyright © 1999 49er-Haters Society
NHS
P.O. Box 973
Felton, CA 95018-0973